Validitas dan Reliabelitas Angket Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif

Husein Sudrajat, Wawan Samudera

Abstract


The instrument has a crucial function in a study. The accuracy of the data taken is also influenced by the level of validity of the research instrument. The validity of the research instrument will also affect the accuracy of the research conclusions. Therefore, before using an instrument to collect data, its validity and reliability must be tested. This study examines the validity and reliability of the questionnaire instrument variable questionnaire transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. The description of the indicators in the transformational leadership questionnaire include charisma, individual attention, and intellectual stimulation. While the innovative work behavior questionnaire includes seeing opportunities, issuing ideas, fighting for them, and applying them. Analysis of the validity and reliability of this study used the IBM SPSS Statistics 24 program. The results of the validation test of transformational leadership variables and innovative work behavior obtained all items valid, because the Pearson Correlation value was greater than 0.30, then after the data were analyzed with validity, all items that validity was analyzed by reliability test, obtaining the value of Cronbach's Alpha Transformational Leadership Variable 0.765 and Innovative Work Behavior Variable 0.863. So that the value of Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted > 0.60. Referring to the results of the reliability test, it can be concluded that the transformational leadership bell instruments and innovative work behavior are all valid and reliable

Keywords


Validity, Reliability, Transformational Leadership Questionnaire, and Innovative Work Behavior

References


Agustina, N. E., Sumarsono, R. B., & Gunawan, I. 2018. Implementation of School and Community Relationship Techniques (A Case Study in SDN Karangbesuki 2 Malang, Indonesia). Proceeding 1st International Conference on Early Childhood and Primary Education (ECPE 2018), Theme: Policies and Strategies to Enhance the Quality of Early Childhood and Primary Education, Atlantis Press, 244, 145-147.

Amirianzadeh, M. 2012. Hexagon Theory-Student Leadership Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 333-339.

Argadinata, H., & Gunawan, I. 2019. The Leadership of Pancasila in Education: Foundation for Strengthening Student Characters in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. The 4th International Conference on Education and Management (COEMA 2019), Atlantis Press.

Bafadal, I., Juharyanto, Nurabadi, A., & Gunawan, I. 2019. Efforts to Improve the Integrity of the Principal with the Moral Debate Model. The 4th International Conference on Education and Management (COEMA 2019), Atlantis Press.

Barnett, B. G., Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. 2000. Cohorts in Educational Leadership Programs: Benefits, Difficulties, and the Potential for Developing School Leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255-282.

Betts, S. C., Morgan, W., & Castiglia, B. 2008. Who is a Leader? Students Implicit Theories of Leadership. Proceedings of the Academy of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 13(1), 1-18.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2012. Thematic Analysis. Dalam Cooper, H., (Ed). The APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Designs (pp. 57-71). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

Brion-Meisels, G. 2015. Centering Students in School-Based Support Processes: Critical Enquires and Shifting Perspectives. Teachers College Record, 117(13), 67-82.

Burge, H. B. 2015. High School students’ Participation in Fine Arts Programs and Perceived Leadership Self-Efficacy. Minneapolis: Walden University.

De Jong, J. dan Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8691.2010.00547.x

Farb, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. 2012. Recent Advances in Research on School-Based Extracurricular Activities and Adolescent Development. Developmental Review, 32(1), 1-48.

Gashema, B. (2021). Predicting innovative work behaviors through transformational leadership: The moderating role of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i1.999

Georgia State University. 2015. 4 Ways Cohort Models Benefit Graduate Students, (Online), (http://education.gsu. edu/4-ways-cohorts-models-benefit-graduate-students/), diakses 20 Maret 2020.

Gunawan, I. 2013. Statistika untuk Kependidikan Sekolah Dasar. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Gunawan, I. 2016. Pengantar Statistika Inferensial. Jakarat: Rajawali Pers.

Gunawan, I. 2017. Instructional Leadership Profile of Junior High School’s Principal (A Case Study of Junior High School in Malang). International Research-Based Education Journal, 1(1), 64-68.

Gunawan, I. 2018. Kepemimpinan Pendidikan: Suatu Pengantar. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang, UM Press.

Gunawan, I., Benty, D. D. N., Kusumaningrum, D. E., Sumarsono, R. B., Sari, D. N., Pratiwi, F. D. Ningsih, S. O., Putri, A. F., & Hui, L. K. 2020. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Kemampuan Manajerial, Efikasi Diri, dan Prestasi Belajar terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Mahasiswa. JMSP: Jurnal Manajemen dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 4(2), 126-150.

Gunawan, I., Benty, D. D. N., Kusumaningrum, D. E., Sumarsono, R. B., Sari, D. N., Pratiwi, F. D. Ningsih, S.

O., Putri, A. F., & Hui, L. K. 2019. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Angket Keterampilan Manajerial Mahasiswa.

JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(4), 247-257.

Hadi, S., Gunawan, I., & Dalle, J. 2018. Statistika Inferensial: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Hallinger, P. 2003. Leading Educational Change: Reflections on the Practice of Instructional and Transformational Leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352.

Hardika, Aisyah, E. N., & Gunawan, I. 2018. Facilitative Learning to Improve Student Learning Creativity. Proceeding 3rd International Conference on Education Management and Administration (CoEMA 2018), Theme: The Challenges of Educational and Technology in Global and Local Era, Atlantis Press, 269, 186-189.

Hine, G. S. C. 2013. Student Leadership Experiences: A Case Study. Leading and Managing, 19(1), 32–50.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.47165/jpin.v4i1.412

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Wawan Samudera